Re: fetch <repo> <branch>:<branch> fetches tags?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brandon Casey <drafnel@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Having said that, I do not particularly think the new behaviour
>> is bad per-se.  If you are storing what you fetched locally in
>> tracking branches, you are interested in their work enough to
>> want to auto-follow their tags.
>
> How is "tracking" defined? Is this a term that implies some configuration
> to link a local branch to a remote branch? Or is any local branch created
> from a remote branch considered "tracking"?

I probably should have said "Instead of just letting fetch
temporarily store the result in FETCH_HEAD and using it from
there, you saved it away; that's a good indication of you care
about it deeply enough".

It's really about what's convenient.  I was somewhat upset that
the behaviour change was not I was very aware of (perhaps I said
it was a good idea and I then forgot), I didn't think the
earlier behaviour was broken, but if I have to choose, I think
the new behaviour is probably slightly nicer than the old one.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux