Re: [PATCH] autoconf: Add test for sys/select.h header file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Some systems like HP-UX don't have sys/select.h; the select stuff
> is already present in some other headef file (e.g. sys/time.h for
> HP-UX).
>
> Companion to
>   "some systems don't have (and need) sys/select.h"
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> It could be alternately just squashed together with
> "some systems don't have (and need) sys/select.h" by Robert Schiele.
>
> Robert, could you please check this patch on HP-UX? It does work
> correctly on Linux (which has sys/select.h).

The issue is not really about "do we have <sys/select.h>?" but
is about "do we need to include <sys/select.h> in order to
obtain declaration of select(2)?" so this is covering only a
half of the issue.  But I guess we will find out if the system
does not offer select(2) whether <sys/select.h> is included or
not, so this is not too bad.

Will apply.  I do not think it would have problems but even if
it does it is small and easy to revert before the final.

Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux