Re: [PATCH 4/9] Discard "deleted" cache entries after using them to update the working tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> It's likely that this should get merged in some way with Linus's series to 
> handle the in-core index differently in general. But this is a simple 
> solution to the problem that's sufficient for this particular series.

Just to let you know, the early parts of lt/in-core-index series
are already in 'next', and it will be one of the first topics to
graduate to 'master' post 1.5.4.

I think we both understand that this round is sent purely for
discussion and I won't be picking them up right now nor later
before the "for possible inclusion" resend you will be making
post 1.5.4, so it should not matter too much which exact version
this round is based on.

It however may be worthwhile for you to plan rebasing your
future rounds on top of 077c48df8a72b046a2f562fedffa1c3d3a73a4e2
(read-cache.c: fix a couple more CE_REMOVE conversion).

Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux