Pascal Obry wrote: > Johannes Schindelin a écrit : >> That is ugly. In a source file which is by no means specific to >> git-commit, you cannot possibly mean to check for "amend". > > Agreed :( I'll try to come with something better. Some option parsers avoid this sort of ambiguity by not allowing short options that take a string to be bundled in the same word with other short options. So, for example, git-commit -am<msg> would not be allowed, while git-commit -a -m<msg> and perhaps git-commit -am <msg> would be allowed. There could still be problems if there were a --mend option that could be typoed as -mend. I don't know enough about compatability to say if this would work for git. -- see shy jo <relurk>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
