On Jan 21, 2008, at 9:50 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Kevin Ballard wrote:Anyway, please see my countless former emails where I ask to work towards asolution instead of just arguing.We know what the solution is:- The OS X filesystem _is_ crap (and you seem to have almost admitted asmuch by your comment that the HFS+ designers did it back in the dark ages and didn't mean for it to ever be a server filesystem anyway)
I agree that HFS+ isn't well suited for tasks which it is being asked to do. I was never arguing that it was the perfect filesystem. But that hardly matters now, I know nobody's going to bother understanding my argument so I may as well just stop trying.
- But we can at least make a wrapper around readdir() return the NFC formon OS X, and effectively hide much of the fallout from the crap.
Again, I don't think that's the correct solution. What about the translation table that was suggested back at the beginning of the thread? That would solve the case insensitivity issue as well, whereas this NFC "solution" does nothing for that.
There is no way around it. Your "solutions" all seem to boil down to asking git to do the same idiotic crap that OS X does, taking all thesame performance hits, and just generally doing crap just to work aroundcrap in your favourite OS.
No, I am not asking git to do the same thing HFS+ does. You just persist in misinterpreting my arguments, no matter how many times I protest that this is not what I am saying.
And no, making git be stupid just to suit a stupid filesystem simply isn'tgoing to happen. So how about you see _my_ point instead: OS X may have an inferiorfilesystem, but we don't have to make git inferior just for that. The factthat OS X does case independence is *its* problem, not git's.
So, what, you're saying git shouldn't do any work at all to try and behave nicer on OS X? Because OS X sure as hell can't change to suit git.
-Kevin Ballard -- Kevin Ballard http://kevin.sb.org kevin@xxxxxx http://www.tildesoft.com
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
