Re: [PATCH] http-push: making HTTP push more robust and more user-friendly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 12:18:14PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > IMHO it is safer to disable it for curl < 7.0xa -- even if it affects a 
> > number of distros -- than to give the illusion that it works, when it does 
> > not.
> >
> > As for fixing it in the non-MULTI case, I have a hunch that Mike's 
> > cleanups will help that, but that this is a 1.5.5 feature.
> >
> > So, I would like to read in the ReleaseNotes something like this:
> >
> > -- snip --
> > Support for pushing via HTTP was broken with curl versions prior to 7.16, 
> > so we disabled it for now.  However, it is likely that a major cleanup of 
> > the http transport code -- scheduled after the release of git 1.5.4 -- 
> > will be supported with more curl versions.
> > -- snap --
> 
> That's tempting but I suspect that it might be a wrong approach.
> 
> I think two important questions are:
> 
>  * Do we know that the current code is broken for everybody, or
>    just broken for the majority of people who do nontrivial
>    things?

IIRC, http-push simply doesn't work without CURL_MULTI. 

>  * Is the code in 1.5.3.8 any better?  IOW, did we make it worse
>    during 1.5.4 cycle?

Changes in http-push.c since 1.5.3.8 mostly involve cleanup. It
didn't change anything about CURL_MULTI or lack thereof.

Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux