Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Steffen Prohaska wrote:

> On Jan 20, 2008, at 2:48 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> > > I bet you'll see a much bigger performance improvement from this on 
> > > Windows in particular.
> > 
> > I bet so, too.  Traditionally, filesystem calls are painfully slow on 
> > Windows.
> > 
> > But I cannot test before Monday, so I would not be mad if somebody 
> > else could perform some tests on Windows.
> 
> Has someone collected the whole series on a topic branch?  I did not 
> follow the discussion closely and apparently more than Linus' patch is 
> needed.  I couldn't immediately figure out which of the patches from the 
> thread should be applied in what order.

AFAICT Linus' patch relies on Junio's lstat() patch that was the OP in 
this thread.

FWIW I applied both patches to current "master" and pushed to the "lstat" 
branch of http://repo.or.cz/w/git/dscho.git

Hth,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux