Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> That's why tying "--git" together with any prefix handling is wrong: >> because it's a totally different issue. It's true that "git-apply" right >> now doesn't understand these things, but assuming we want to teach >> git-apply to apply to subprojects eventually (we do, don't we?) we'll >> eventually have to teach it. > > That's all correct but > > * currently diff does not recurse, nor apply does not apply > recursively; > > * "git diff" that comes with 1.5.4, if we do not do anything, > can produce a diff that will be rejected by the stricter > check "git apply" has when used with --no-prefix and friends; > > * submodule aware versions of "git diff" can be told to add > "--mark-as-git-diff" when it passes "--src-prefix=a/git-gui" > and "--dst-prefix=b/git-gui" when it recurses internally, to > defeat what my proposed patch does. > > So I think it makes more sense to mark output as a non-git diff > when custom prefix is used in the version we are going to ship > as part of 1.5.4. Do you still have objections to the patch? I do not think it matters _too much_, but I think starting stricter and then making things more relaxed later is easier than the other way around. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
