torsdagen den 17 januari 2008 skrev Johannes Schindelin: > Hi, > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, JM Ibanez wrote: > > > If you check the standard, two Unicode codepoints (i.e. the numeric > > value that gets stored on disk) *can* map to the same character, hence > > they are the same. > > As Linus _already_ pointed out, you are confusing characters with glyphs. > Someone is. He is refering to the unicode definition of an (abstract) character. Ch3.4 D11 - "A single abstract character may also be represented by a sequence of code points—for example, latin capital letter g with acute may be represented by the sequence <U+0047 latin capital letter g, U+0301 combining acute accent>, rather than being mapped to a single code point. -- robin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
