Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > I never understood why people want to complicate things by being able to > name default _keys_ differently. Why not letting "origin" being the > default being pulled from, and be done with it? That happens to match my personal feeling. HOWEVER. We treat 'origin' in a special way when you do this: $ git clone somewhere new.git $ cd new.git $ git checkout HEAD^0 $ git pull And we already have "clone -o" and claim to support that option. I think that it is very reasonable from the consistency point of view to make sure that the following sequence treats 'frotz' the same special way the above treats 'origin' specially: $ git clone -o frotz somewhere new.git $ cd new.git $ git checkout HEAD^0 $ git pull A purist alternative is to deprecate "git clone -o" and eventually remove it. Note that I was agreeing only with this specific aspect of the argument. I am not at all interested in getting involved in refining or re-defining the existing submodule semantics this late in the cycle before 1.5.4. But I can very well see that fixing this specific inconsistency can be separated out from the rest of Mark's series and viewed as a set of trivially correct fixes. > Besides, I _really_ do not understand why we have such a > discussion in rc phase. There are _many_ more interesting > discussions now that _also_ do not belong into a freeze phase. Currently the ones I looked at and consider possible 1.5.4 material are http-push fixes from Grégoire Barbier and parse_commit_buffer() tightening from Martin Koegler. Recently I looked at the following patches and topics but I do not think any of them belongs to 1.5.4. None of them is obvious and trivially correct fix to regressions or serious existing bugs: * compress/decompress abstraction (Marco) * crlf (Steffen Prohaska and Dmitry Potapov) * whitespace error: "cr at eol is ok" (me) * various conflicting submodule changes(Ping Yin, Mark Levedahl, Imran M Yousuf) * unconfigured ident safety (Stephen Sinclair) * gitweb feed from commit to commitdiff (Florian La Rouche -- Jakub seems to be on top of this so I am not worried about it too much). * color.ui (Matthias Kestenholz) * test scripts to use valgrind (Jeff King, but there was another one in the past -- can their efforts compared and coordinated better?). * various lstat(2) reduction changes (me). * pathname safety on insane filesystems (Linus, Robin Rosenberg, me). (yes, some of the above list do not even have any code). I am hoping that authors will resend the ones they really care about after 1.5.4, as I do not want to take patches early. Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html