On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > > The only issue I know about with using unpack_trees in C as a replacement > for read-tree in shell is that unpack_trees leaves "deletion" index > entries in memory which are not written to disk, but may surprise some > code (these are used to allow -u to remove the files from the working > tree). I certainly agree that this patch should be double-checked. I'm pretty sure the issue you mention wouldn't be an issue, since the end result is only used for actually updating the index and writing it out as a tree (both of which should handle the magic zero ce_mode case ok), but it would certainly be good to walk through all cases. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
