Stephen Sinclair a écrit :
I disagree: git does not work "fine" over http, it only works fine for
fetch/pull.
You're taking me out of context. I meant it works fine for public
hosting so that users can easily clone and create patches. This is
the main motivation for publishing your repo, so in that sense it
"works fine". (for me)
I agree.
Since SF supports ssh, there's no reason to need http-push. I wish
they would just provide some recent git binaries on the sourceforge
server, then we could git-push properly over ssh instead of using to
use scp or rsync. I think that would be a good start. *shrug*
In any case, http-push over webdav would still require git binaries to
be installed somewhere on SF, so it's essentially the same problem.
I don't think so. A working http-push over webdav would be a dumb
protocol (passive filesystem upload).
However as you said before, this would not be taken in account by SF
statistics and menus.
--
Grégoire Barbier - gb à gbarbier.org - +33 6 21 35 73 49
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
