Re: CRLF problems with Git on Win32

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Steffen Prohaska wrote:
> 
> I already started to teach everyone the new "autocrlf=input" policy to 
> avoid these questions.

I certainly don't think "autocrlf=input" is wrong. It might even be a 
reasonable default on Unix, although I don't think it's nearly as obvious 
as the Windows case. I wouldn't mind using it myself, for example, 
although probably only because I know that for the stuff I work on it 
simply cannot possibly ever do the wrong thing.

In fact, we had a case of bogus CRLF in one of the kernel documentation 
files for some reason that we ended up fixing by hand. "autocflf=input" 
would have fixed it (except in that case it wouldn't have, since it came 
from the original kernel tree, long before crlf was an issue for git ;)

So I'd say that autocrlf=input is quite possibly a good idea on Unix in 
general, but my gut feel is still that it's not a big enough issue to be 
actually worth making a default change over. But there's absolutely 
nothing wrong with having it as a policy at a company that has mixed Unix 
and Windows machines.

(Every place I've ever been at, people who had a choice would never ever 
develop under Windows, so I've never seen any real mixing - even when some 
parts of the project were DOS/Windows stuff, there was a clear boundary 
between the stuff that was actually done under Windows)

			Linus


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux