On Jan 11, 2008 7:03 AM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > IIUC your patch only replaces the term "origin" by something > user-specifiable. I fail to see the use of it; care to explain what > workflow is easier with your patches than without? > > Ciao, > Dscho Consider a project with several servers, each of which is *supposed* is host the same project but due to lags in mirroring across airgaps, etc., are never quite in sync. Now, we get on a teleconference and discuss issues, find differences, and everyone reports that "origin" has x, but in fact "origin" means different servers to almost everyone. Also consider that only a small subset of the group really understands git, most just follow cook-book recipes to get their work done and don't understand what is going on. This is my problem: "origin" is an abstraction that hides the different server names in use and makes communication difficult, having everyone use nicknames related to their particular upstream server reduces the confusion. Mark - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
