On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Marco Costalba wrote: > > When decompressing a zlib stream use this > helpers instead of calling low level zlib > function. I really *really* hate your naming. > This is the first step in generalizing compress and > decompress functions avoiding zlib directly calls. If that's the goal, why keep the horrible "z_" prefix, and why the opaque and non-obvious "inflate"/"deflate" names? I'd suggest that you just replace all "z_deflate_" with "compress_" and "z_inflate_" with "decompress_". Yes, it would still leave zlib-specific stuff in there (the return codes, the "z_stream" type thing etc), but at least it would be a _step_ towards more readable code and code that is less obviously zlib-specific. With those changes, I'd heartily recommend merging this even if we never actually switch away from zlib, if only because zlib has all these horrible names. Linus [ How many people really know that "inflate" means "uncompress", without having to think about it a bit? I guarantee that any computer person immediately knows the difference between "compress" and "decompress" without even thinking, but ask somebody what "inflate" vs "deflate" does, and they'll be able to answer you, but they'll first have to think about an air mattress or something. Yeah, yeah, old-time zip users probably think the whole xxflate thing makes sense, and I'm just grouchy because _I_ always have to think about it. ] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
