Re: Decompression speed: zip vs lzo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sam Vilain <sam@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I think to go forward this would need a prototype and benchmark figures
> for things like "annotate" and "fsck --full" - but bear in mind it would
> be a long road to follow-up to completion, as repository compatibility
> would need to be a primary concern and this essentially would create a
> new pack type AND a new *object* type.  Not only that, but currently
> there is no header in the objects on disk which can be used to detect a
> gzip vs. an lzop stream.  Not really worth it IMHO - gzip is already
> fast enough on even the most modern processor these days.

For the compression type detection, I was hoping that we could
do something like sha1_file.c::legacy_loose_object(), but I tend
to agree it is not probably worth it.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux