Re: CRLF problems with Git on Win32

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Gregory Jefferis wrote:

> On 9/1/08 12:41, "Steffen Prohaska" <prohaska@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I'll further think about "crlf=safe" (see another mail in this 
> > thread). I like the idea of safe because it guarantees that data will 
> > never be corrupted.  But I have no time to think about it immediately.
> 
> crlf=safe [i.e. munging CRLFs only if there are no bare LFs] sounds 
> appealing to me as well because it looks like munging that is always 
> reversible.

There is a bigger problem here, though: As of now, you can add a (loose) 
object from a big file pretty easily even on a small machine, because you 
do not need the whole buffer, but you stream it to hash-object.  IIRC 
Junio wrote a patch to allow this with "git-add", using fast-import, but 
that patch probably hasn't been applied.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux