Re: [PATCH 1/2] sideband.c: Use xmalloc() instead of variable-sized arrays.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano schrieb:
> Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> Having said that, I'd actually prefer to stay with variable-sized arrays
>> if they prove portable enough because we don't need the handful of free()s
>> on function exits. Junio, if you like I can resend patch 2/2 using
>> variable-sized arrays.
> 
> As an old fashoned git myself, and given the fact that the
> possible prefix and suffix are small number of short constant
> strings, I actually prefer a simpler-and-more-stupid approach.
> 
>  sideband.c |   18 +++++++++++++-----
>  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Thanks, your version works well here, too, as a replacement of my two patches.

-- Hannes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux