Re: CRLF problems with Git on Win32

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Jeff King wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:56:00AM +0100, Peter Karlsson wrote:
> 
> > If I occasionally need to do a
> > 
> >  git add -kb binary.txt
> > 
> > to flag a file explicitely, that's a small price to pay for everything 
> > else to work out of the box.
> 
> For you, perhaps, since you apparently infrequently commit binary files 
> and derive some benefit from CRLF conversion. But please bear in mind 
> that there are people on the other end of the spectrum who want the 
> opposite (i.e., who could care less about CRLF, but _do_ have binary 
> files).

Do not forget the people who say that git is a content tracker (as opposed 
to a content munger).  Git was really intended as a tracker of octet 
strings which are organised in tree structures, and where you can have 
revisions over those tree structures.

That is the beauty of git: it keeps simple things simple.  Now, for some, 
this is a curse ;-)

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux