Le Sun, 06 Jan 2008 14:52:33 -0800, Junio C Hamano a écrit : > So a more convincing presentation would be: > ... Will split. > After I wrote all that, I realized that the patch is not acceptable as > is. > > Why? > > This makes a successful cherry-pick way too silent. With your patch, we > will see: > > * "Auto-merged ..." messages that shows what paths are affected > by the cherry-pick/revert (which I do not think we would want to > squelch), > > * "Finished one cherry-pick." > > But we will lose the "Created commit ...: <msg>" and "<num> files > changed..." summary, neither of which we would want to lose. I'll have a look. This seems to require refactoring the interface between cherry-pick/ revert and commit. > Also sign your patch (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches), please, when > you try the second round. > > Thanks. Thanks, I appreciate the review. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
