[Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx>]
> Pascal Obry <pascal@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Brandon Casey a écrit :
> > >
> > > Not sure how often such a command would be used though, so
> > > it may not be worth it.
> >
> > I've missed it many times. Especially in some scripts when I want to use
> > the stash-stack to store current working tree and clear it before
> > exiting. This is not possible today as all the stash-stack would be cleared.
> >
> > I agree that drop seems better.
>
> or "git stash delete"
Something like drop or delete would be nice.
I tried to "clear" a single stash once. Oops!
Is there a reason that git stash apply couldn't take a small integer
as the argument (at least as an alternative) instead of stash@{0}, etc?
Brian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
