Re: [PATCH] git stash: one bug and one feature request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 4, 2008 7:00 PM, Brandon Casey <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Marco Costalba wrote:
> > Ok, drop is better then clear, but, if we need to add a new command I
> > vote for 'delete' or 'rm' to be consistent with git naming.
>
> If the stash list is thought of as a stack, then drop makes sense.
>

Yes, but is _not_ as a stack because you can say

git stash apply stash@{3}
git stash apply stash@{1}
git stash apply stash@{4}

i.e. you can access reflogs in any order, so thinking to a stack is
misleading IMHO.

Marco
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux