Wincent Colaiuta <win@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > El 22/12/2007, a las 17:22, Junio C Hamano escribió: > >> I like that "To restore them..." insn, and I like that this is >> much less invasive than anything we have seen during the >> discussion. But can we do this only for an accidental "git >> stash" not for a deliberate "git stash save"? > > Something like this then? Sure, even like this. git-stash.sh | 6 ++++-- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/git-stash.sh b/git-stash.sh index f16fd9c..ade300c 100755 --- a/git-stash.sh +++ b/git-stash.sh @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ save_stash () { git update-ref -m "$stash_msg" $ref_stash $w_commit || die "Cannot save the current status" - printf >&2 'Saved "%s"\n' "$stash_msg" + printf >&2 'Saved working directory and index state "%s"\n' "$stash_msg" } have_stash () { @@ -228,7 +228,9 @@ create) *) if test $# -eq 0 then - save_stash && git-reset --hard + save_stash && + echo >&2 '(To restore them type "git stash apply")' && + git-reset --hard else usage fi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html