Re: kha/safe and kha/experimental updated

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Thanks again for maintaining these branches.
> 
> On 18/12/2007, Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >   git://repo.or.cz/stgit/kha.git safe

> >       Remove "stg resolved"
> 
> I'd like to keep this command. git-mergetool doesn't support the tool
> I use (emacs + ediff and more stgit-specific file extensions like
> current, patch etc.). I also don't find 'git add' to be meaningful for
> marking a conflict as solved.

I also would like to have this command kept (and shown in 'stg help'!).
Contrary to 'git add' it can check and add to index / update index
only for files with conflict; we have -r (ancestor|current|patched)
to choose one side, and we could add --check to check if there are
no conflict markers with files (useful with -a/--all).

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux