Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Martin Langhoff" <martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> If cvs 1.11 doesn't talk with 1.12 I'll say there are nuts - minor >> revisions should interoperate with end users not even thinking about >> it. But 1.5.5 has in its changelog lots of deprecations and interop >> changes. >> >> It's not good communication to label it 1.5.5. > > There indeed are handful scheduled removals. I do not mind declaring > that 1.6.0 comes after 1.5.4, or just relabel the removal schedule for > 1.6.0 and keep the scheduled change on hold a bit longer. By the way, I wonder if there would be packv4 in time for 1.6.0; perhaps not enabled by default. -- Jakub Narebski Poland - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
