"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 04:52:16PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> >> > By the way, just as a data point: I do keep some git repositories on >> > NFS, and access them from multiple machines with different git versions >> > (not on purpose--it's just that the machines don't all run the same >> > distro, so it'd be extra work to give them all the same version). I >> > don't use anything older than 1.5.0. If the repository became unusable >> > on one of those machines without warning it'd be annoying. >> >> What the v1.5.5 release notes will say is that you'll have to set >> pack.indexversion=1 to remain compatible with pre-1.5.2 Git versions. > > Is there any reason not to make pack.indexversion=1 the default (for > preexisting repositories at the very least) and suggest in the release > notes that people set something else if they want the features the new > version provides? That's a judgement call. Pack-idx format v2 is by design much safer in the face of bitflip (do we have a test case to make sure this is indeed true?). But from the end user's point of view, all the usual "I do not want to be forced to update that old box I do not want to touch" applies. And the people who needs to suffer from the dilemma are only the ones who access a single repository across NFS with git from different vintage. If that is a minority and/or tends to be more clueful people, the inconvenience factor may be outweighed by the advantage v2 offers, and pushing adoption of v2 harder the way Nico is driving at would generally be a good thing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
