Re: [PATCH] Re-re-re-fix common tail optimization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 02:23:27PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Yeah, I amended it without adding another "re-" to the title ;-)  The
> result has been already pushed out.

OK. Too late, but it has my ack. ;)

> > Aren't we using "git diff" for the second diff there nowadays?
> 
> Some people seem to think that is a good idea, but I generally do not
> like using "git diff" between expect and actual (both untracked) inside
> tests.  The last "diff" is about validating what git does and using "git
> diff" there would make the test meaningless when "git diff" itself is
> broken.

I think that is a valid concern. But ISTR that were some issues with
using GNU diff. Commit 5bd74506 mentions getting rid of the dependency
in all existing tests, but gives no reason.

-Peff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux