Wincent Colaiuta <win@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > El 16/12/2007, a las 4:48, J. Bruce Fields escribi> Reorganize to emphasize the most complicated part of the code (the tab >> case). > > Any chance of either squashing this series into one patch seeing as > its all churning over the same part of the code, or resending it with > numbering? The patches seemed to arrive out of order in my mailbox and > I don't really know what order they're supposed to be applied in and > it's a bit hard to review. I do not think squashing is necessary or a good idea in this case. As far as I can tell, the series does not have "oops, this fixes the earlier problem I introduced in the series", but it is purely a logical progression. The first one fixes a bug introduced by the 0-base conversion which can and should stand on its own. The mails were properly threaded with in-reply-to so numbering is not strictly necessary either, but would have helped readers with MUA that do not pay attention to that header. I already see JBF resent the series, which is very nice of him. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
