Re: [PATCH] Add an "-i" option to git-reset, to confirm a reset.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Dec 15, 2007 7:35 PM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2007, Kelvie Wong wrote:
>
> > It shows a diffstat, and asks the user if they would like to continue,
> > or show a full diff of the things getting reset.
> >
> > I know that many times, I do a reset --hard thinking I had commited a
> > file already, but it turns out that I hadn't; and so this makes sure I
> > don't lose any work when the caffeine wears off.
> >
> > Maybe it should also be made that only hard resets take this option, as
> > I cannot see this being useful in other places.
>
> I am slightly negative on this patch.  Not only do I think that it is both
> easier and more natural to run diff/status/an-alias to see what a reset
> would do, but the patch only handles the index_file part (missing the --
> <file> part AFAICT).
>
> Besides, the code style is incompatible with the surrounding code.
>
> Ciao,
> Dscho
>
>
[forgot to hit Reply To All again, sorry!]

Ah, you're completely right about the index_file part (this is
actually the first time I've looked at the git-code :P)

Hrm.. I should have just used a shell script wrapper instead it seems.

I do think something like this would be nice though.

w.r.t. the style, you were referring to just the array initializers
right?  Or was there something else I did that doesn't look right?
-- 
Kelvie Wong
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux