Re: Something is broken in repack. Why not with fork and pipes?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, J.C. Pizarro wrote:

> It's good idea if it's for 24/365.25 that it does
>  autorepack-compute-again-again-again-those-unexplored-deltas of
>  git repositories in realtime. :D

This sentence does not parse.

> Some body can do "git clone" that it could give smaller that one hour ago :D

Neither does this.

> To Linus, Why don't you forget the threaded implementation of your 
> repo-pack?

Please do a little research before you ask such questions: it is neither 
Linus who did it, nor is it better to use processes than threads.

Besides, your proposal has nothing to do with the issue of this thread 
(memory consumption).

Ciao,
Dscho
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux