Hi, On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Jason Sewall wrote: > On Dec 12, 2007 12:23 AM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I use git-gui and gitk for my git graphical needs because they rock > > > and at the end of the day, the fonts and antialiasing aren't that > > > big of a deal, especially since I'm usually doing quick scans and > > > searches over the information those tools display, not reading > > > novels in them. > > > > Good points. Features win over pretty most of the time. But at some > > point pretty is important; especially to new user adoption. Plus if > > you are looking at it all day long it shouldn't be jarring to the > > eyes. But git-gui still isn't even where I want it ot be > > feature-wise. E.g. I'd *love* to teach it inotify support, so you > > don't even need to have that Rescan button. > > On that note, did you see what I wrote above, about having "split hunk" > functionality? I had a patch for splitting hunks in git-gui in August, but there were some issues that I did not yet resolve. If you want to work on it, I'll gladly share that patch with you. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
