On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 04:35:19PM +0100, Andreas Ericsson <ae@xxxxxx> wrote: > A bit of both ;-) > > I like the idea to use the git object store, because that certainly > has an API that can't be done away with by user config. The reflog > and its expiration mechanism is subject to human control though, and > everyone doesn't even have them enabled. I don't for some repos where > I know I'll create a thousand-and-one loose objects by rebasing, > --amend'ing and otherwise fiddling with history rewrites. > > Having a tool that works on some repos but not on others because it > relies on me living with an auto-gc after pretty much every operation > would be very tiresome indeed. There is already a tool that relies on reflogs: stash. Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
