H.Merijn Brand schrieb: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:20:55 +0100, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> Junio C Hamano schrieb: >>> "H.Merijn Brand" <h.m.brand@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>> 3 I am willing to believe that HP_UX' vsnprintf () is broken, or >>>> at least does not conform to the expectations in the GNU world, >>>> but chickening out like the way strbuf_addf () does is maybe a >>>> bit too rude, so I forced a minimum of 64bytes available. That >>>> fixes a lot! >>>> >>>> but it still breaks t4013 :( >>> I think Shawn had something similar for Solaris, and if it is a small >>> cost to help portability, it does not feel so bad. >> Windows's vsnprintf() is broken in two regards: (1) It returns -1 if the >> buffer is too small; (2) the size parameter is not the size of the buffer, >> but the max. number of chars to write (i.e. does not count the NUL). How >> broken is HP-UX's? > > Do you have a simple test program to show how `broken' it is? > I have 10.20, 11.00, 11.11, 11.23/PA and 11.23/IPF and both > HP C-ANSI-C and gcc Sorry, no. vsnprintf's behavior on Windows is actually documented, so to be fair it is not "broken", but "unwanted". -- Hannes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
