On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 11:04:36PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > My previous change led to the In-Reply-To header being <> when the given > > value was empty. This fixes it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > I think I have an antispam problem somewhere with this patch, because even > > keeping sending it, it never reached the list. And Junio didn't answer to my > > private message about it, so I guess that was some server being smart with > > the subject line. *sigh* > > > > PS: sorry Junio if you get this patch multiple time. > > No, I happened to have noticed the same and have an almost identical fix > (I said "defined $initial_reply_to") already queued in my tree. Testing "defined $initial_reply_to" might not be enough, because $initial_reply_to can be defined and empty. Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
