Re: [PATCH] don't mention index refreshing side effect in git-status docs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Jonathan del Strother" <maillist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> ... the GIT-VERSION-GEN
> script occasionally gives me spurious 'dirty' results (eg when a file
> timestamp changes despite the content having changed).

Good eyes.  Either refreshing before diff-index or using the "git diff"
Porcelain would be more appropriate.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux