Re: [PATCH] don't mention index refreshing side effect in git-status docs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 12:33:19AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > If there is some desire to document the side effect, I think we should
> > at least remove the mention of speeding up git-diff (which is just wrong
> > now).
> 
> Why is it "just wrong"?  Having to squelch the false hits and to run
> auto-refresh are both unnecessary overhead if your index is fresh.

I mean that this is not a useful technique for speeding up git-diff
anymore (assuming you have not tinkered with autorefreshindex, in which
case I assume you know what you are doing and don't need this tip).

Did you think I meant "there is no speedup with autorefreshindex off",
or are you arguing that even with the new diff behavior there is still a
speedup in "git status; git diff" over just "git status"?

-Peff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux