Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 11:47:56PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Which would make the rewritten patch like this... > > Looks like our patches just crossed paths. Yours looks OK, but we > should add something to the 'configuration' section, and... > >> diff --git a/wt-status.h b/wt-status.h >> index 225fb4d..63d50f2 100644 >> --- a/wt-status.h >> +++ b/wt-status.h >> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct wt_status { >> >> int git_status_config(const char *var, const char *value); >> int wt_status_use_color; >> +int wt_status_relative_paths; >> void wt_status_prepare(struct wt_status *s); >> void wt_status_print(struct wt_status *s); > > Shouldn't both of these ints be marked "extern"? I'm surprised it worked > at all (or perhaps the part of my brain that stores C linkage issues is > rotting?). Yes, rotting very much. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html