On 12/7/07, Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > Does the gcc repo contain some giant objects? Why wasn't the memory > > freed after their chain was processed? > > It should be. > > > Most of the last 10% is being done on a single CPU. There must be a > > chain of giant objects that is unbalancing everything. > > I'm about to send a patch to fix the thread balancing for real this > time. Something is really broken in the last 5% of that repo. I have been processing at 97% for 30 minutes without moving to 98%. -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
