Re: In future, to replace autotools by cmake like KDE4 did?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The autotools ( automake + libtool + autoconf + ... ) generate many big
> files that they have been slowing the building's computation and growing
> enormously their cvs/svn/git/hg repositories because of generated files.
[cut]

And this is relevant for this mailing list exactly how? From the whole
autotools package git uses only autoconf, and only as an optional part
to configure only Makefile configuration variables.

Generated files should not be put into version control, unless it is
for convenience only in separate branch like HTML and manpage versions
of git documentation are in 'html and 'man' branches, respectively.
The same could be done with ./configure script.

Although there was some talk about whether giw should use autotools,
or perhaps CMake, or handmade ./configure script like MPlayer IIRC,
instead of its own handmade Makefile...

-- 
Jakub Narebski
ShadeHawk on #git
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux