Re: [PATCH/RFC (amend)] autoconf: Add test for OLD_ICONV (squelching compiler warning)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Which means the real-life compilation will get the warning on type
>> mismatch.  Wasn't OLD_ICONV about squelching that?
>
> Gah, I don't know why I though OLD_ICONV was about compile errors, and
> not about compile warnings. This version uses -Werror to check for
> warnings; I hope it doesn't give false positives...

But use of -Werror means you are married to gcc, doesn't it?

How important is it to detect OLD_ICONV anyway, I have to wonder?

> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Pascal Obry wrote:
> ...
>> Note also that you should remove all the hard-coded settings
>> in Makefile anyway.
>
> No, I should not. ./configure script is purely optional in git,

Correct.  Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux