Re: Corrupted (?) commit 6e6db85e confusing gitk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> I recall that the very initial git did not use the current format for
> timestamp but ctime() return value

Yes, but..

> and this will also notice them (and convert-objects will be there for 
> us).

.. I don't think we have actually accepted the ctime-string format since 
switchng over, so no existing git repositories will have them. The commit 
date parsing just does a "strtoul()" in parse_commit_date().

So I wouldn't expect convert-objects to be needed - or rather, it was 
needed 2.5 _years_ ago, and we've not supported those early broken formats 
since, afaik.

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux