Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > "Kevin Leung" <kevinlsk@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Nov 30, 2007 4:41 PM, Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Still, 'git stash' alone should *do* the stash. >>> >> >> How about `git stash' still does the stash, and `git stash llist' >> exits with usage message? And if you want to save the stash with name, >> you can only do it with `git stash save name_of_stash'. > > Sounds like a sensible thing to do. Instead of "save", one could use "stash" since that is what it is supposed to do. Then git stash stash stash would create a stash called "stash". -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
