On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 21:07:10 +0100, Alex Riesen wrote: > Jakub Narebski, Thu, Nov 29, 2007 03:26:12 +0100: > > + <s id="git"> > > + Medium. There's Git User's Manual, manpages, some > > + technical documentation and some howtos. All > > + documentation is also available online in HTML format; > > + there is additional information (including beginnings > > + of FAQ) on git wiki. > > + Nevertheles one of complaints in surveys is insufficient > > "Nevertheless" (two "s"). I think it's not amount of documentation that's insufficient, but rather the organization. The problem is not that the information is not there, but that it's sometimes not easy to find. > BTW, I wouldn't call the level of documentation "Medium" when compared > to any commercial SCM. How can they earn more than "a little", when > compared to any opensource program? I don't know that many commercial SCM, but clearcase does have more than "a little" documentation. > [...] > > > @@ -1106,6 +1165,10 @@ TODO: > > There exists some HTTP-functionality, but it is quite > > limited. > > </s> > > + <s id="git"> > > + Good. Uses HTTPS (with WebDAV) or ssh for push, > > + HTTP, FTP, ssh or custom protocol for fetch. > > + </s> > > You forgot bundles (aka SneakerNet). > Again, compared to everyone else it is "vastly superior" :) In fact at least darcs and bzr can also do SneakerNet. -- Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb@xxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
