On Nov 30, 2007 4:12 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 06:51:35AM +0100, Steffen Prohaska wrote: > > > What will happen to gitk? > > > > Shouldn't it be included in the nice collection? gitk is > > an essential command. Then, following your reasoning, > > "git <tab><tab>" should recommend it, no? > > > > Note, "git gui" already works. gitk would really be the last > > git "command" that can't be accessed through "git <command>" > > Except for qgit, tig, etc. The only difference being that gitk actually > ships with git. > > But I am not opposed to having some "git foo" form for gitk. In mercurial "hg view" is actually an old version of gitk modified for hg. And as "git view" it could be added to the "git help" list. Santi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
