Re: [PATCH] Move all dashed form git commands to libexecdir

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Nov 30, 2007 6:28 PM, Eyvind Bernhardsen
<eyvind-git-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 29. nov. 2007, at 23.36, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > If people are really serious about reducing the number of commands in
> > the path, I would expect fixes and bugreports saying "I am setting
> > gitexecdir different from bindir in _my_ installation when I build
> > git,
> > and here are the things that does not work if I do so".  Within the
> > span
> > of more than 20 months (77cb17e9 introduced gitexecdir in Jan 2006), I
> > do not think there was a single such report or patch, other than the
> > message from Nguyen that started this thread.
>
> I'm setting gitexecdir different from bindir in my installation, and
> here are the things that don't work:
>
> - When pushing to my system over ssh, git-receive-pack and git-upload-
> pack are expected to be in $PATH.  I resolved the problem by putting
> symlinks in /usr/local/bin.
>
> I haven't seen any other problems, but then again, I only use git
> plumbing commands and my own scripts.

You remind me my experience of making every external C-based command
builtin. There is another case: git-merge. It calls  something like
git-merge-$strategy.

-- 
Duy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux