Re: [PATCH] Move all dashed form git commands to libexecdir

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 07:52:01PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:

> > I am still against this step, for the reasons mentioned in the mails
> > leading up to the one you just quoted. I am fine with "does not install
> > hardlinks for builtin-commands on systems that don't support hardlinks"
> > (and of course all such hardlinks are in $(libexecdir)/git-core at this
> > point).
> 
> But only for porcelain, right?  You certainly don't need the dashed form 
> of plumbing commands?

In principle, yes, though one man's porcelain is another man's plumbing,
so determining the correct set is hard (and why bother if they are all
hidden from mere mortals, anyway?).

Perhaps because I am actively working on git, I tend to use a fair
number of plumbing commands for under-the-hood inspection and
experimentation.

-Peff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux