On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 23:48:12 +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Jan Hudec wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:32:10 +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > > 4. If git-gui would use other language/toolkit, would you > > > > contribute? > > > > Yes/No > > > > > > Yes, as long as it is a language/toolkit that is available on all > > > platforms that I (have to) work. That pretty much excludes C# and > > > Python as a language. > > > > Out of interest, where does neither of those two work and Qt and tcl/tk do? > > Mono and python both seem to be quite portable. > > IRIX (an ancient one). > > Besides, Mono is darned slow. Even Tcl/Tk is faster. On the shootout Mono seems to be an order of magnitude faster in most tests. But maybe they are performing very poorly on some strange platform where they don't have JIT. > Furthermore, my complaint was not about a platform where neither C# nor > Python work. That is irrelevant. If you have one platform where only one > works, and another platform where only the other works, you cannot have a > single program for both platforms. Right? Right. I probably shouldn't be surprised that mono does not work on older unices, but I am a bit surprised python does not. -- Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb@xxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
