Re: Rollback of git commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Nov 28, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
(That is, "git rebase -i" seems
to work fine for making changes to a single logical patch series, all of whose patches are prepared locally and aren't independantly named in some particular fashion; the things that aren't handled are "I need to replace
the pull of netdev.git with a new pull of netdev.git" or "I need to
replace '[PATCH] fix-the-frobnozzle-gadget' with
'[PATCH v2] fix-the-frobnozzle-gadget'.)

I use rebase -i for that last case and it works fine -- I mark the appropriate commit as "edit" in the patch list and the rebase stops there, at which point I can update the patch in any way I see fit: tweak it a bit, replace it with a different change entirely, change the commit message, etc. What's missing from rebase -i in that respect? I guess it's not as easy to script for automated patch replacement.

-Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux