Re: Rollback of git commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/28/07, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 11:07:29PM -0500, Geert Bosch wrote:
>
> > I have always wondered why refs and tags are not
> > in the regular object store. In a way, there
> > should be just one root pointer (SHA1) pointing
> > to a tree with refs, etc.
>
> Assuming that they also retain the "having an object implies having all
> of the objects it points to" property, then it makes it hard to talk
> about subsets or single refs. If I fetch from you and you communicate
> your repo state as some hash, then I am stuck getting _all_ of your
> refs to complete this property.

push/pull would still work at the branch level. The local state
tracking objects wouldn't be exchanged.

>
> -Peff
>


-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux