Re: Rollback of git commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, November 27, 2007 11:37 pm, Jon Smirl said:

> Patch management is an important part of the work flow. I would hope
> that git implements patch management as a core feature in future
> versions. stgit/guilt/quilt are valuable since they blazed the trail
> and figured out what commands are useful. As time passes these
> features can become more highly integrated into core git.

Think this is a separate topic from where we started though.

> Of course you've never screwed up a repository using git commands,
> right? I've messed up plenty. A good way to mess up a repo is to get
> the data in .git/* out of sync with what is in the repo. I'm getting
> good enough with git that I can fix most mess up with a few edits, but
> it took me two years to get to that point. Rolling back to a check
> point is way easier. User error and a command failing are both equally
> valid ways to mess up a repo.

What are you looking for that reflogs don't already handle?

Cheers,
Sean

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux